Recently while in Washington D.C., I advocated for rural housing and healthcare concerns and engaged in meaningful discussions with our U.S. Senators and Congress members.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
Please log in to continue |
Recently while in Washington D.C., I advocated for rural housing and healthcare concerns and engaged in meaningful discussions with our U.S. Senators and Congress members.
I had conversations about the importance of supporting appropriations for the USDA RD 523 Mutual Self-Help Program which offers numerous benefits, including providing affordable homeownership through sweat equity, which reduces construction cost for participants. It fosters strong community bonds as families work together to build each other’s home. Additionally, it enhances local economies by creating jobs, supporting local small businesses, contractors, and building material suppliers in rural communities.
We also talked about supporting appropriations for the USDA RD 502 Direct and 502 Guaranteed Loan programs that provide valuable benefits for individuals and families in rural communities by offering up to 100% financing, making it ideal for those who may struggle to save for a traditional mortgage.
We also mentioned the importance of continuing to fund HUD Housing Counseling programs. HUD Housing counseling empowers individuals and families to make informed housing decisions, which in turn stabilizes neighborhoods and bolsters local economies by promoting responsible homeownership and preventing foreclosures.
Several implications could arise for residents in rural communities if there are cuts to Medicaid.
Reduced Access to Healthcare Services: Many residents, particularly low-income individuals, may find it more difficult to access necessary medical services, including preventive care, emergency services, and specialized treatments. This could lead to untreated health issues and worsening overall community health.
Strain on Local Healthcare Providers: The hospital and local clinics may experience increased pressure due to higher patient volumes from those unable to receive care elsewhere or those who delay seeking treatment until conditions worsen. This could lead to longer wait times, reduced quality of care, and potential closures of smaller health facilities.
Economic Impact on the Community: The reduction in Medicaid funding could lead to job losses within the healthcare sector and related industries. Additionally, as residents face increased healthcare costs and potential health declines, local businesses could suffer from reduced consumer spending, leading to broader economic challenges in the community.
I believe we can always find common ground and shared interest as we work towards solutions.